Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Boost Your Research Visibility
Make sure your publications are tied to your unique identity by registering with these services:
- ORCID - This non-profit organization provides an identifier researchers can use across multiple platforms.
- RESEARCHERID - Primarily used to track publications within Web Of Science. This is free to use and allows you to accurately build a list of your own publications in Web of Science. You can associate your ORCID with this account as well.
- Create a Google Scholar Citation Profile: Creating a profile does not require a Google Account. Researchers can track their citations, and users can view your profile, including scholar ranking metrics like H-Index. Keep in mind that citations reported by Google Scholar are derived from their index, which includes dissertations, theses, and other non-published or non-peer reviewed work. Mis-attributions of articles are also common, as well as duplicate versions and citations. So be sure to closely monitor articles attributed to you.
Number of total citations from ATU affiliated authors, 2003-2019, retrieved from Web of Science September 2019
There are many tools available to measure scholarly impact. This includes the impact of an article, a journal, or an author. These tools, when used properly, can help the researcher:
- Determine impact of an article, book, journal, or other scholarly item
- Compare publication averages with peers in the same field and in the same career level
- Identify suitable venues of publication for their work
- Track latest research within a field
- Identify and collaborate with other scholars working on the same research problems
- Prepare an impact story for grant proposals, promotion & tenure, or departmental or university assessment
While citation metrics can provide some quantitative indication for the relative value of work, all measures have flaws and subjective qualities. To use citation metrics responsibly:
- Do NOT use citation counts & averages alone to determine overall impact. A variety of sources should be consulted, both qualitative as well as quantitative to tell an impact story.
- Do not compare the metrics of works or authors across disciplines.
- Each number is contextual to the source. When citing a citation measurement, the source of the data should always be reported.
- Every citation measure can be gamed.
- There is no one source for ALL citations.
RESULTS MAY VARY! Consult your librarian when in doubt.
Recommended Resources for Scholarly Publishing
The world of scholarly publishing is constantly changing. Stay informed with these recommended blogs, news sites, and journals:
The Scholarly Kitchen
Published by the Society for Scholarly Publishing, whose mission is to "advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking."
"Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process."
Blog published by Cabell's, it contains news and resources relating to journal publishing.
Academic journal concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by statistical mathematical methods.
The Open Scholarship Initiative (OAI)
Working in partnership with UNESCO and all stakeholders everywhere to create the global future of open research. Includes policy briefs and news.